B/W filters

Zion Cowboy

A
Zion Cowboy

  • 0
  • 0
  • 4
.

A
.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 50
Kentmere 200 Film Test

A
Kentmere 200 Film Test

  • 4
  • 1
  • 115
Full Saill Dancer

A
Full Saill Dancer

  • 1
  • 0
  • 120
Elena touching the tree

A
Elena touching the tree

  • 6
  • 6
  • 212

Forum statistics

Threads
197,776
Messages
2,764,108
Members
99,466
Latest member
GeraltofLARiver
Recent bookmarks
0

gwatson

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
146
Location
Windsor, UK
Format
Multi Format
Hi all

Not sure where to put this one, but here seems reasonable. I generally don't go for too many filters, but I've recently needed them, so a question...

I'm inclined to go for Lee filters: I don't want to spend a fortune, but then again there is no point in paying $1000 for a lens and putting a piece of crap plastic in front of it. Lee produce resin and polyester filters - resin being by far the more expensive. Has anyone had experience of these types of filters and is it worth paying the extra for resin; I've heard conflicting reports.These are to be used on both MF and LF kits.

Thanks

Geoff
 

rbarker

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
2,218
Location
Rio Rancho,
Format
Multi Format
I think it depends on what you're looking for, Geoff. Resin filters, while still somewhat delicate, are more robust than gels or polyester. Plus, they are thicker - 1mm or so (don't recall exactly), so are designed to fit slip-in holders/adapters that deal with the thickness.

All of that is separate, of course, from round, screw-in glass filters. There, I believe the Lee filters have aluminum retaining rings, which are somewhat more prone to sticking in the lens threads. The more expensive brands (e.g. B+W) use brass rings, which don't stick as easily. Whether the glass used in the more expensive brands really matters is an issue that will continue to be argued by both the manufacturers and their customers.
 

voceumana

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
896
Location
USA (Utah)
Format
Multi Format
Gels & polyester filters are of fine quality and will not degrade your images. But they are fragile, and the last time I looked at Kodak gel prices, they are insanely priced.

I bought gels when they were a few bucks a piece, the last time I looked some were $45. For being so fragile, it doesn't make sense to me to pay that price. Even the polyester filters seem too high in price for what you are getting.

Personally, I would not use resin filters. The thickness is enough to worry me about image degradation. When I buy new filters, I buy BW coated ones and cringe at the price, but know they are quality stuff.

Charlie
 

Lee Shively

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
1,324
Location
Louisiana, U
Format
Multi Format
When it comes to resin filters, I believe you get what you pay for. I have a couple of Singh-Ray graduated ND filters that are excellent but they cost about $100 each. Resin is easy to scratch, hard to break. Gels are very fragile, excellent in quality but expensive. I've never used poly filters.

Good quality screw-in glass filters are rugged and pretty inexpensive in comparison. Even the lower priced Tiffen and Hoyas that I've used have been excellent. B+W filters are more expensive but better made. You can always buy glass filters in the largest size you will ever need and use step-up rings to mount on lenses that use smaller size filters, thereby saving some cash.
 
OP
OP

gwatson

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
146
Location
Windsor, UK
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for the input folks. I guess it is like everything: you get what you pay for.

Most of what I do is studio based and I don't have a great need for filters, but I bought a Cokin x-Pro some time ago for an old pentax 67 lens and the thing was so thick I thought it couldn't possibly be any good. It seemed to work OK though.

I'm more inclined to go for square-type filters since I have many different size lenses that I might at some point use them with, but resin always seems too think, and poly too cheap. I've heard that cheap filters don't damage image quality and I've also heard that they do. I like the idea of glass, but get a bit sick of them getting jammed on the lens. As a result of this thread, perhaps I should look at gels. As I have said, I don't use them a great deal and therefore they won't have a perticularly hard life. Step-up rings are also something my poor wasted brain hadn't thought of, so a look at the higher end screw filters is worth a look. Thanks all.

Geoff
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
345
Location
Datchet, Ber
Format
Medium Format
If the thickness worries you ( and I'm not sure it should ) you might want to take a look at HiTech filters , which are also available in 100mm width, since they are thinner than Lee. They are also a bit cheaper, generally.
 
OP
OP

gwatson

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
146
Location
Windsor, UK
Format
Multi Format
Hi David

I'll take a look. The thickness doesn't worry me too much; it was just a bit of a shock to see something sooo thick. Price is not so much of an issue either really, it's just that I'd use them so rarely, I don't wan't to spend more than I have to. I'd only need a couple. But I don't want to buy something I'd feel unhappy with using (like using out-of-date film - probably OK, but worth the risk???)

Datchet eh. I live about a mile from you in Eton. Small world.

Geoff

PS: Have you ever been to the Italian in Datchet? Always looks quite tempting.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
345
Location
Datchet, Ber
Format
Medium Format
Thats a coincidence. Haven't tried that place personally, though I think my wife has and that she wasn't too impressed. You'll often find me in the Tiger Garden in Eton though.
 

Lee Shively

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
1,324
Location
Louisiana, U
Format
Multi Format
If your primary concern about screw-in glass filters has to do with the filter ring sticking to the lens threads, then check into B&W filters and step rings. Being brass, they don't stick as easily as the aluminum used in the lower priced Tiffens and Hoyas I've used. When you compare prices of the larger size filters, I have found the B&W's aren't too much more expensive than the Tiffens and Hoyas.
 
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
795
Location
Lymington, S
Format
4x5 Format
I don't have a problem with the rings sticking and my gear is only used outdoors and lives in a Lowepro. Normally I leave the adaptor rings on my lenses for long periods of time and when required, they come off no problem. The large diameter does offer lots of leverage should they get stiff. This just hasn't been an issue.

I have Lee resin filters for colour work and have been using the cheap gels for B+W with no obvious degradation on my 5x4. That said, it is the orange which I use most and has become quite scratched, so have ordered a resin one today. Lee quality control is exemplary.

Oh and I used to sail at Datchet Water!
 

Gerald Koch

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,662
Format
Multi Format
Some people prefer a green filter for scenics since it will both darken the sky and also lighten foliage.
 
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
795
Location
Lymington, S
Format
4x5 Format
Gerald Koch said:
Some people prefer a green filter for scenics since it will both darken the sky and also lighten foliage.

Suggest clicking on his ebay shop link and having a look at the wonderful images Geoff makes and you will see why he isn't asking about a green filter.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
18
Location
Istanbul, Tu
Format
Multi Format
Geoff,
I only use good quality glass filters, and I have never experienced problems with them. Mine are B+W and Heliopan - I highly recomment them. As sugegsted above, if you invest in large filters, you can put them on smaller lenses, and provided you don't abuse them, they'll last forever. To me it makes more sense to invest in these filters than to empty my wallet for gels and things..
 
OP
OP

gwatson

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
146
Location
Windsor, UK
Format
Multi Format
Thanks again for all the comments. Seems like the glass filters are slightly ahead. Have to say, I'd rather stick a fine (thin) piece of glass on my lenses than anything else. I shall update this thread accordingly.

There seems to be a million and one things to do in and around Datchet. I even went for a dive in Wraysbury Lake last year. I wouldn't recommend it, but it was an experience. Tiger Garden is nice; Gilbey's is good as well. Anywhere else is a bit of a tourist trap. (PM me for restaurant recommendations.) Cheers all.

Geoff

PS: Baxter: Cheque's in the post ;-)
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom