Any idea what a Rolleiflex 2.8C Planar is worth?

Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 0
  • 0
  • 33
Summer Lady

A
Summer Lady

  • 0
  • 0
  • 38
DINO Acting Up !

A
DINO Acting Up !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 25
What Have They Seen?

A
What Have They Seen?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 36
Lady With Attitude !

A
Lady With Attitude !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 37

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,763
Messages
2,780,553
Members
99,700
Latest member
Harryyang
Recent bookmarks
0

AgentX

Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
204
Format
Medium Format
Just bought a 2.8C Xenotar for about that, cla'd from Koh's camera, with $15 upcharge to install a rolleigrid.

I really love the camera; only disadvantage is the need to have an uncocked shutter to get into the 1/500th shutter speed position.

The aperture blades have a circular opening, rather than polygonal, if that sort of thing matters to you.
 

jimsberg

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Messages
26
Location
CA
Format
35mm
Rollei 2.8C

I happen to prefer the later Rolleis that have the removable waist level finder so that a Rollei prism can be fitted allowing eye level viewing with unreversed image. The C, as I recall, does not have this feature; the E and F models do, as well as the Rollei T (I have this model) and the Rolleicord Vb, I believe. Your price for the C is probably OK. Frankly, the 3.5 Tessar on the T and the 3.5 Xenar on the Cord are perfectly fine lenses when in good condition without the very high prices of the -Flex E and F models. If you go for the prism models beware of condition of the prism--they often have glass separation problems which may not be fixable. As a matter of interest, the T model Tessar was considered to be quite a good lens using rare earth glass.

Hope all this doesn't confuse you! Condition of whatever you buy is the most important thing!!
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,476
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
Frankly, the 3.5 Tessar on the T and the 3.5 Xenar on the Cord are perfectly fine lenses when in good condition without the very high prices of the -Flex E and F models.

That's true, but having shot a good 3.5 Xenar 'cord and a good 2.8 Planar 'flex side by side, I have to say I found the difference to be significant. It's not that the Xenar is *bad*, just that the Planar is something special.

What that difference is worth in price terms is another question. But US$450 sounds pretty reasonable to me for a 2.8C if it's in good user condition.

-NT
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom