An abberation ?

Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 0
  • 0
  • 33
Summer Lady

A
Summer Lady

  • 0
  • 0
  • 38
DINO Acting Up !

A
DINO Acting Up !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 25
What Have They Seen?

A
What Have They Seen?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 36
Lady With Attitude !

A
Lady With Attitude !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 37

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,763
Messages
2,780,560
Members
99,700
Latest member
Harryyang
Recent bookmarks
0

Focus No. 9

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2010
Messages
240
Format
35mm
Thought I would check with the experts.
Please take a look at the white smudge in the lower center on the tree trunk... this smudge is also on the neg. Is the smudge a film production abberation or a developing abberation? TMax 100 developed by pro shop.
My frist try using the Argoflex and on Argus Day..quite a learning experience... so excuse the exposure/compensation. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0003.jpg
    IMG_0003.jpg
    277.8 KB · Views: 167

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,359
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
When I zoomed in, I saw spots all over the place. My first thoughts are that there was a problem in the film development, since it was also on the negative. Problems like this are rare in film manufacturing because of the high standards of quality control.

Steve
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,923
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
Possibly crud from film transport rollers at lab. It either left a deposit or it ate into the emulsion on the film itself.
 

Luc More

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
23
Format
35mm
Thought I would check with the experts.
Please take a look at the white smudge in the lower center on the tree trunk... this smudge is also on the neg. Is the smudge a film production abberation or a developing abberation? TMax 100 developed by pro shop.
My frist try using the Argoflex and on Argus Day..quite a learning experience... so excuse the exposure/compensation. Thanks.

Looks a lot like a dusty negative to me.
 

ruilourosa

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
797
Location
Portugal
Format
Multi Format
this reminds me the problems i had 15 years ago when i tryed to develop films in a tray in a dusty compartment, i thought it was the camera i had been using at the time, a super ikonta that proved to be a nice thing... :cool:
 

jamesgignac

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Messages
281
Location
Beijing, Chi
Format
Multi Format
Yes, there's lots of dust as you surely know and the 'crud' at the bottom probably comes from the lab. I've had similar issues with some labs before - the best advice I can offer is to develop them yourself - you never know when the person working on your roll is going to be in a place where he/she doesn't really care about keeping it clean and professional. Is the mark dug into the negative or created by something that's stuck on the surface? It's possible that it could be washed off but this can be easier said than done.

Again - invest in a tank and some chemicals. You don't need a darkroom to develop negatives...just a temporarily dark room and a little practice loading the reals. Best of luck!
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
If it's an important neg, may be soak it in Photoflo for 5 mins to see it the crud will wash off.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom