Alternate materials that work like wood

The Bee keeper

A
The Bee keeper

  • 1
  • 1
  • 49
120 Phoenix Red?

A
120 Phoenix Red?

  • 6
  • 3
  • 69
Chloe

A
Chloe

  • 1
  • 3
  • 76
Fence line

A
Fence line

  • 10
  • 3
  • 125
Kenosha, Wisconsin Trolley

A
Kenosha, Wisconsin Trolley

  • 1
  • 0
  • 102

Forum statistics

Threads
198,154
Messages
2,770,428
Members
99,567
Latest member
BlueLizard06
Recent bookmarks
0

jjstafford

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
731
Location
Minnesota Tr
Format
Multi Format
This past Winter was the second full of failures trying to build a rather unique camera using wood. Wood is just not strong enough when as thin as I need it.

I am hopeing that net-wisdom here can point me to alternative materials that can be worked using wood-working tools (and meanwhile saving my pennies to have the parts machined in aluminum.)

The application is entirely of flat materials, 1/8th and 1/4" thick, with no joints (corners). Help?

tia
 

Dandy97

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
18
Location
Wisconsin
Format
4x5 Format
PVC, Polycarbonate and Nylon. All much stronger than wood in simular thickness and all workable with woodworking tools.
 

argus

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,128
Format
Multi Format
Dandy97 said:
PVC, Polycarbonate and Nylon. All much stronger than wood in simular thickness and all workable with woodworking tools.
Those might be workable like wood, but they won't all be as rigid as wood.
Stability is a very important issue, rigidness is the key.

G
 

noseoil

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
2,887
Location
Tucson
Format
Multi Format
"Wood is just not strong enough when as thin as I need it."

Will you please list the properties necessary and engineering application which requires this material? Is the camera you are building a secret? Shear, axial load, tension, compression, bending? Spill the beans. tim
 

Bob F.

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
3,977
Location
London
Format
Multi Format
Have you thought of ply? Model makers shops sell it in various thicknesses. Or, you could laminate your own if you want something with an exotic wood finish... or laminate two sheets of wood with a kevlar, fiberglass or carbon fibre centre....

Bob.
 

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,230
Format
Large Format
In aircraft pattern building there is a material that is called Phenolic. I am not sure of the exact and proper name for this material. It can be machined to very precise tolerances, is rigid and strong. You may want to check into that. This material would not be susceptible to dimensional instability in the way that wood could be possibly.

Additionally, carbon fiber would be a good material. This composite is finding it's way into many aircraft fuselage assemblies because it is strong and it is light.
 
OP
OP

jjstafford

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
731
Location
Minnesota Tr
Format
Multi Format
noseoil said:
"Wood is just not strong enough when as thin as I need it."

Will you please list the properties necessary and engineering application which requires this material? Is the camera you are building a secret? Shear, axial load, tension, compression, bending? Spill the beans. tim

First, please understand that I am not an engineer so I don't know what you are talking about; all I can give you is an idea.

4x5. The lens weighs around nine pounds. Picture an almost symetrical lens with 6" front lens, 5.25" rear lens with a Copal #2 in the middle - a deep waisted profile.

The lens would sit in a two-point cradle fastened (welded is fine) to a rail - round is good. Except for the back, there are no squared surfaces. Front and middle cradle points hold the very front of the lens (the only flat area up there) by a simple light pinch (not pressed), and the middle cradle is split with the top piece to pin the lens (gently) using sunken allens (like a scope mount). A third point is the tripod mount in front of the rear cradle. The bellows is anchored/swung from the very rear of the lens which, incidently, sits about 1" from the film. Bellows is about 2" deep (focus from very close to infinity is possible in that space).

Stainless would be nice, but aluminum will do.

I have tried plywood, and even laminated my own. Too weak for the thinness I want.
 

noseoil

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
2,887
Location
Tucson
Format
Multi Format
Look into the materials used in aircraft cabinetry. Honeycomb should do the job, but it takes a bit of practice to work out the details of fastening and construction. tim
 

Claire Senft

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
3,239
Location
Milwaukee, W
Format
35mm
All of these tips you received are fine but at least you are now in the position of building a nice cozy fire. Try that with your polycarbonate.

Good luck
Claire
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
1,041
Location
Holland, MI
Format
Pinhole
So what kind of beast lens is that?

Another thought I had was a machinist 'hogging out' a body from one piece of metal. I've seen that done (not for a camera, however). It seemed like a waste of a cube of aluminum but it was the only solution.

Murray
 
OP
OP

jjstafford

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
731
Location
Minnesota Tr
Format
Multi Format
gregdavis said:
Phenolic resin will work for your application, as Donald suggested. Go to www.mcmaster.com and search under plastics for "garolite". [...]-Greg
Ah, good tip. I do appreciate it Greg. Don, you too. Thanks. Black 1/8 and 1/4" should work out very well. And it is light, too!
 
OP
OP

jjstafford

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
731
Location
Minnesota Tr
Format
Multi Format
Murray@uptowngallery said:
So what kind of beast lens is that?
Murray

The second proof-of-performance prototype is here: http://elearning.winona.edu/jjs/nl

(The first was a crude wooden platform - literally, a platform with an 110v shutter.)

However, the lens I'm working on now (#3) is is machined differently, using a Copal #2, and we are retaining the filter holder... and of course, getting rid of that Sinar body.
 

barryjyoung

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
426
Location
Patterson MO, USA
Format
ULarge Format
Laminate hardwood veneer and rotate each layer 45 degrees or so making your own plywood in whatever shape you like. Or just use aluminum. You can work it with a portable drill and files. Just go slow and be careful. Or get a machinist to do it for ya.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
With a lens that big and heavy, wouldn't it be easier to make a camera back and mount it to the lens? A strong cradle for the lens, a lighter one for the back. Bag bellows between. Since the "camera" wouldn't be carrying the weight of the lens, it can be much lighter and simpler.

Just a thought...
 
OP
OP

jjstafford

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
731
Location
Minnesota Tr
Format
Multi Format
Ole said:
With a lens that big and heavy, wouldn't it be easier to make a camera back and mount it to the lens? A strong cradle for the lens, a lighter one for the back. Bag bellows between. Since the "camera" wouldn't be carrying the weight of the lens, it can be much lighter and simpler.

Just a thought...
My drawings are abysmal, I know. (did you see them on the second page?) Let me try to clarify: the lens and frame is one piece attached to the tripod block. The back moves back and forth on the rail on the and is not stressed.

Here's a larger sketch. The bottom shows a shadow where the tripod screw goes into the block. http://elearning.winona.edu/jjs/proto/NW13.jpg

The tripod block is at the balance point and can be moved a bit left anyway.

A bag bellows is a good idea. Thanks!

Dunno. Is that more clear or am I still missing something?
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
That's what I thought I saw - a camera back attached to a lens. Which leaves me wondering where you need strength for the wooden (or not) parts? The back will only be carrying it's own weight, not the lens...
 

barryjyoung

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
426
Location
Patterson MO, USA
Format
ULarge Format
Confused here.

OK, we have the Ferrari priced lens and now we want to skimp on the body? Why does the body material have to be workable with hand tools? Why not have a machinist (me for example) make you what you need? This seems an awful lot like a Holga on a Ries tripod. Am I missing something here?

Barry
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom