Well I walked 50 Km both ways on ice and snow with barb wire wrapped around bare feet in a blizzard and it was uphill in both directions so I could save 5 cents by not using the coal fired trolleybuses.
I can get up to fourteen stops out ISO 125 films and ISO 400 films, but for a wide range of lighting ISO 400 provides greater flexibility without flash. I do not have problems getting a great deal of latitude between shadows and highlights with Tri-X400, but Ilford FP4 can force me to drag...
The chrome C lenses are less ergonomic and require harder to find B50 filters, so one saves money with the C lens, suffers with the controls and has to invest in another set of filters. Not really a cost savings.
I have the 150 CF. I do not use it much because I do not shoot portraits often. I use the 250mm more. I have been told that the 180mm is better for portraits.
I have bought refurbished Epson printers and scanners in the past and they preformed well. There were no refurbished V850 when I bought mine, had there been I might have bought one.
Well to quote you:
Seriously or siriusly, as I stated before touching up is acceptable but changing the message or meaning of the composition departs photography and enters graphic arts, editorial statements et al.
Calling cameras Kodaks was common speech; calling cutting objects out and pasting in other objects to change the meaning of the presentation is not photography. One should invent a label for their work style, but it is not photography.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.