Search results

Site your information source. Was the equipment handled and stored correctly? Sounds apocryphal.

You should not need to do that.

That is what the hat is for.

I took really fast photographs.

So will I. I am down to two rolls.

Abe books, Amazon [check daily], eBay [check daily], Alibris https://www.alibris.com/books/

Our job is to enable members to spend money on photographic equipment, darkroom equipment, projectors and supplies. Your spending will help us reach our goals.

Perhaps I might weaken and but the variable length extension tube and the 135mm for the heck of it. So much available money and nothing to spend it on. Oh me, oh my, such troubles.

+1 Other than myself, who else here has never made a mistake. Oh, once I thought that I had misjudged something but in the end it turn out that I had been right all along.

For starters: Kodachrome is too complex, hard to develop, and very obsolete Both HIE and Ektachrome IR were financed by the Defense Department as a National Treasure to that it would be available for the Intelligence Community.

I considered the 120mm and the 135mm but I just do not do enough close up work. I barely use the 150mm other than to flatten prints because I rarely do portraits so no 180mm although I did think about it. The 30mm and the 500mm were offered at a price I could not refuse.

The Sekonic L-308 does reflectance, incident [especially good for white on white, predominantly white, for black on black, predominantly black] and flash.

30mm Fisheye, 38mm SWC, 50mm, 80mm, 100mm, 150mm, 250mm, 500mm + 2XE tele-extender.

I have used a wide range of focal lengths for landscapes from the 30mm Fisheye to 1,000mm [2XE + 500 mm Hasselblad lens]. It all depends on your vision. Pun very much intended.

I would like Kodak UltraColor and Kodak VividColor to come back in 135 and 120. Generally I do not think about what might come, I prefer to keep my sanity.

STOCK. I posted STOCK is straw colored and it has been for a long time. No problems.

Does this help?

By the way all my stock XTOL is straw colored and I do not have problems with my replenished XTOL.

I just developed a Tri-X 4000 135 roll. I clipped and saved the leader for future developer testing. I completely unwound the film to take the spool off. When I tore off the tape then end of the film was rounded. I did not have to clip the corners before loading it on the reel. Who woulda...

The camera is way behind where it should be for its age, so you better get to work to restore it usage to where it should be. If you have any problems check with us and if necessary have it serviced. Then buy a lot of film and get to work taking photographs. Enjoy!

I will save a place for you in the traffic.

Uh, that would be "No". Sorry. But cheaper than replacing the lens once you damaged it beyond use.

I tried that using all the right tools ... and I destroyed the lens. Do not cheap out, sent out to get fixed properly OR just save the time and aggravation and time and buy another lens.

I can imaging him walking down the street with the three of them hanging around his neck. Now that is eye candy.

More people die from Dihydrogen Oxide related deaths than any other chemical!

Me too. I only use FaceBook for keeping in contact with those who only use FaceBook.

I would like to have the 70mm backs and Jobo development system like you do, but I do not shoot enough film to go to the trouble. Also I also shoot Portra 400 which is not available in 70mm perforated format.

But not in the US since Kodak lost a antitrust law suit in the 1920's. Also see post #96.

Regularly people post that the costs of [fill in whatever brand you think is expensive] is priced high because the manufacturer is greedy. That company does not have a corporate goal to make a huge profit nor drain your bank account, they are covering their costs so that they can stay in...