Van Dyke versus Argyrotype

Both of these were printed with the same 4x5 negative. Van Dyke is on the left, argyrotype on the right. Basically the Van Dyke is a lot "warmer" than the argyrotype, but they both have nearly the same inherent contrast. They also both have a ridiculously long tonal range -- this is a very hard negative for conventional printing because of its contrast. I've found that a very dilute selenenium bath will cool off the Van Dykes and get them to look much like the argyrotypes.
Location
Boston
I much prefer the Van Dyke for what it's worth. I think it has a better glow. Very pleasing tones.
- Thomas
 
The processes are completely identical for printing and very easy as well. I guess which process one uses depends on whether one wants a warm or cold look. I can see the argyrotype being great for cold, metallic type subjects.
 
I used Weston diploma parchment for these. I've also done it with Bergger cot 320. Both are beautiful for this process. I've done a lot of cyanotyping on Bienfang calligraphy parchment, and I like that one too.
 
What is causing all the streaking in the images? Brush strokes? It's very distracting from the image and you might want to get that under control.

Best,

Ryan McIntosh
www.RyanMcIntosh.net
 
Yes, it's brush strokes, but you can barely see it at all on the actual prints. This process is extremely sensitive to even coating, I've found. I haven't tried it with a puddle pusher yet, but with a hake brush I can mostly get it very even.

But the scan really overemphasizes it, you'll have to take my word for that.
 
Glad this came around again-excellent! and thanks!
 

Media information

Category
Experimental Gallery
Added by
DrPablo
Date added
View count
1,746
Comment count
8
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Filename
comparison.jpg
File size
113 KB
Date taken
Thu, 24 May 2007 1:49 AM
Dimensions
802px x 320px

Share this media

Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…