Vahid.
Very well done! The image has a soft sharp feeling to it, I am very sorry, but I cannot in any way view this image as pornographic. It is simply a beautiful reclining female figure. The light is far from being too hard, though it might be printed down a bit to enhance the flesh tones. Just a thought, not a criticism. Charlie...............
Well I just got back to the gallery after a bad experience. My neighbor showed up to start fixing up my bathroom/darkroom. He had two of his 4 kids with him. I had this image up on the screen whent eh door bell rang. I didn't think anything about it. The guy and his kids come in, he and I go into the bathroom to start making the shelf supports. His oldest daughter (6) came in and whishpered to her dad. He got a funny look on his face and asked If I had some kind of porno site up on my computer. I had forgotten this was on there. he told me his daughter asked "Why does Tim's mom have a picture of a llady playing with her pee pee?"
You may have done well, but from my persepctive, This is not an image I want on my screen again.
I Like the concept and the model is very nice. But it looks too digital for me, especially the skin tones , some would bet it comes straight out of a 350D or D70.
Maybe this is your intended effect, maybe the scanner did it with the C41 film, for me the skin looks too plastic-like here on the monitor and the transitions from bright to dark at her right arm for example look "digital" too.
Leaving aside this effect I like it tho.