ACUG--Analogue Cine User Group Discussions

Looks like women are making good headway into film preservation

  1. slackercrurster
    Association of Moving Image Archivists

    Only problem is women are very prejudicial when it comes to archival work and can make poor archivists when they inject their female thinking into preservation.

    Here is an example:

    Notice: Contains Nazi / white supremacist photo that may offend someone. If so, don't click on link, go immediately to your safe room.


    Now, they do have good women archivists that are not so prejudicial. The Kinsey Institute has some. And a few more here or there that I've run into. If you have a women that is an artist, especially underground artist, she may be less prejudicial. I have lots of experience dealing with women archivists and curators. They seem to make up the bulk of this area of work.

    But Jeeeesus, look what our world has turned into...isn't it sad?

    From the section on Gender Pronouns from the AMIA site:

    This year our registration information includes gender pronouns that will be included on name badges at the conference. AMIA is committed to creating a diverse and inclusive environment – we not only want people to be comfortable being themselves, we strive to build a culture where we don’t make assumptions or pass judgment on each other. Having pronouns on our badges – or if a person chooses to tell you their pronouns – is simply letting you know how you can refer to colleagues, without you having to make any assumptions.

    Why add pronouns to the conference badge?

    Typically, society has taught us to make automatic assumptions about what pronouns to use for someone. If a person’s gender expression (the way they appear in terms of gender) seems to be male, we’d likely use he/him/his when talking about that person; if a person’s appearance seems to be female, we’d be likely to use she/her/hers. However, gender is not always that simple. Sometimes a person’s gender identity (the way the person identifies internally in terms of their gender) doesn’t align with their gender expression (the way they look). In addition, not everyone identifies strictly as male or female.

    So when a person includes their gender pronouns on a nametag or when introducing themselves, etc., they are simply taking the guesswork away for you! It’s their way of saying “when you refer to me using pronouns (opposed to by my name), these are the pronouns I’d like for you to use.”

    Why is are pronouns important?

    Everyone has a gender identity, and most of us have specific pronouns we’d like people to use when we are being referred to. Some might ask: Isn’t it typically obvious what pronouns to use for a person? (For instance, if someone has a ‘female’ name and looks ‘female,’ then can’t one assume that person identifies as female and would want to be referred to with she/her/hers pronouns?)

    Most of us are privileged in that when someone guesses our pronouns, they’ll get them right. However, that’s not the case for everyone. Oftentimes this might be because a person is gender non-conforming (where they don’t clearly conform to ‘traditional’ male or female standards) or are openly transgender (which might also leave some unsure which pronouns to use). With that said, if someone decides to tell you their pronouns, it doesn’t automatically mean they are transgender or gender non-conforming. It’s basically a way of saying “rather than operating in a system where we assume each other’s gender and automatically attach pronouns to each other, I’ll instead let you know what pronouns work best for me.” Isn’t life easier when we’re not always having to assume things about each other?
    slackercrurster Dec 1, 2018
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. If you have a Photrio account, please log in (and select 'stay logged in') to prevent recurrence of this notice.